Hawa Nafsu Tidak Wajar Laki Laki dan Perempuan

Perbandingan Antara Surat Seneca 95 dan Surat Paulus di Roma 1:26-27

Authors

  • Harold Pardede Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Moriah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62200/newlight.v2i2.117

Keywords:

Homosexual, Romans 1:26-27, Seneca Letter, Unnatural Relations

Abstract

The Apostle Paul's writings in Romans 1:26-27 explain unnatural sexual relations between men and women. This text is generally translated as the practice of same-sex (homosexual) relations. But long before the writings of the Apostle Paul there was a letter from the famous Stoic, Seneca, which discussed the background to the practice of same-sex relationships among the Romans. The text in Seneca's letter does not directly refer to Homosexual practices as traditionally understood in Paul's writings in Romans 1:26-27. This research aims to compare Seneca's letter 95 with Paul's writing in Romans 1:26-27. It aims to provide a different perspective on homosexuals and can provide historical background in Roman culture to Paul's writings in Romans 1:26-27. The research method in this research is hermeneutics and literature review. According to Romans 1:26-27, homosexual practices are a sin that incurs God's wrath. Meanwhile, for Seneca in letter 95, engaging in same-sex relations in Roman culture was motivated by a loss of wisdom, lack of self-control and the destruction of the morals of men and women, thus creating unnatural relationships.

References

Bellincioni, M. (1979). Lettere a Lucilio (Vol. 15). Brescia: Paideia Editrice.

Booth, A. (1991). The age for reclining and its attendant perils. In W. J. Slater (Ed.), Dining in a classical context (pp. 105 - 120). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Brookins, T. A. (2014). Corinthian wisdom, Stoic philosophy, and the ancient economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brooten, B. J. (1996). Love between women. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Brown, M. L. (2015). Bisakah Anda gay dan Kristen: Menyikapi homoseksualitas dengan kasih dan kebenaran. Jakarta: Nafiri Gabriel.

Corbeill, A. (1997). Dining deviants in Roman political invective. In J. P. Hallett & M. B. Skinner (Eds.), Roman sexualities (pp. 99-128). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Dunbabin, K. M. D. (2003). The Roman banquet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dunn, J. (1988). Romans (Vol. 2). Dallas: Word Books.

Dupont, F. (1992). Daily life in ancient Rome. Oxford: Blackwell.

Ellis, J. E. (2007). Paul and ancient views of sexual desire. London: Continuum.

Gathercole, S. J. (2008). Sin in God’s economy: Agencies in Romans 1 and 7. In J. M. G. Barclay & S. J. Gathercole (Eds.), Divine and human agency in Paul and his cultural environment (pp. 494 - 499). London: T&T Clark.

Hallett, J. P. (1989). Female homoeroticism and the denial of Roman reality in Latin literature. Yale Journal of Criticism, 3(1), 179–197.

Harti, S. D. (2020). Pentingnya pelayanan pastoral terhadap korban LGBT. Jurnal Luxnos, 6(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.47304/jl.v6i2.55

Hays, R. B. (1986). Relations natural and unnatural Robert: A response to John Boswell’s exegesis of Romans 1. The Journal of Religious Ethics, 14(1), 184–215.

Imamat 18:22; 20:13. (n.d.).

Jatmiko, B. (2019). Hakekat seksualitas manusia: Perspektif Gereja Kristen Nazarene di abad 21 terhadap praktek LGBT. Sanctum Domine: Jurnal Teologi, 4(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.46495/sdjt.v4i1.15

Jewett, R. (2000). The social context and implications of homoerotic references in Romans 1:24-27. In D. L. Balch (Ed.), Homosexuality, science, and the ‘plain sense’ of scripture (pp. xx-xx). Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

Käsemann, E. (1974). An die Römer. Mohr Siebeck: Tübingen.

Keck, L. E. (2005). Romans. Nashville: Abingdon.

Klostermann, E. (1933). Die adäquate Vergeltung in Röm 1, 22-31. ZNW, 32, 1–6.

Knust, J. W. (2006). Abandoned to lust: Sexual slander and ancient Christianity. Columbia: Columbia University Press.

Laqueur, T. (1990). Making sex: Body and gender from Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Licht, H. (1932). Sexual life in ancient Greece. London: The Abbey Library.

Linebaugh, J. A. (2013). God, grace, and righteousness in Wisdom of Solomon and Paul’s letter to the Romans. Leiden: Brill.

Marshall, C. W. (2014). The works of Seneca the Younger and their dates. In G. Damschen & A. Heil (Eds.), Brill’s companion to Seneca (pp. xii + 883). Leiden: Brill.

Martin, D. B. (1995). Heterosexism and the interpretation of Romans 1:18-32. Biblical Interpretation, 3(3), 332–355.

Miller, J. E. (1995). The practices of Romans 1:26: Homosexual or heterosexual. NovT, 37(1), xx-xx.

Newman, B. M. (2018). Kamus Yunani-Indonesia. BPK Gunung Mulia.

Nissinen, M. (1998). Homoeroticism in the Biblical world. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress.

Nolland, J. (2000). Romans 1:26-27 and the homosexuality debate. Horizons in Biblical Theology, 22(1), 32–57.

Parker, H. N. (1997). The teratogenic grid. In J. P. Hallett & M. B. Skinner (Eds.), Roman sexualities (pp. 47-65). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Richlin, A. (1993). Not before homosexuality. Journal of the History of Sexuality, 3(4), 531.

Rowe, C. K. (2016). One true life: The Stoics and early Christians as rival traditions. London: Yale University Press.

Sanday, W., & Headlam, A. C. (1902). A critical and exegetical commentary on the Epistle to the Romans. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.

Saputra, B. E. (2016). Pengaruh presuposisi homoseksual dalam membaca Alkitab: Sebuah studi terhadap penafsiran kaum revisionis atas Roma 1:26-27. Jurnal Theologi Aletheia, 18(11), 83–120.

Schreiner, T. R. (1998). Romans. Grand Rapids: Baker.

Seneca. (1925). Epistles, Volume III: Epistles 93-124. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Setiawan, T., Simanjuntak, F., & Hermanto, Y. P. (2021). Perspektif etis, yuridis dan teologis terhadap perkawinan sejenis. Te Deum: Jurnal Teologi dan Pengembangan Pelayanan, 11(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.51828/td.v11i1.140

Singgih, E. G. (2019). Menafsir LGBT dengan Alkitab: Tanggapan pernyataan Persekutuan Gereja-gereja di Indonesia (PGI) mengenai LGBT. Gunung Mulia.

Skinner, M. B. (1997). Quod multo fit aliter in Graecia. In J. P. Hallett & M. B. Skinner (Eds.), Roman sexualities (pp. xx-xx). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Smith, M. D. (1996). Ancient bisexuality and the interpretation of Romans 1:26-27. JAAR, 64(2), 223–256.

Sprinkle, P. (2015). Paul and homosexual behavior: A critical evaluation of the excessive-lust interpretation of Romans 1:26-27. BBR, 25(4), 519–539.

Steven, U. A. (2017). Alkitab menentang pernikahan sesama jenis kelamin. Verbum Christi: Jurnal Teologi Reformed Injili, 4(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.51688/vc4.1.2017.edi

Sutanto, H. (2007). Hermeneutik: Prinsip dan metode penafsiran Alkitab (Revisi). Departemen Literatur SAAT.

Swancutt, D. (n.d.). The disease of effemination.

Taylor, R. (1997). Two pathic subcultures in ancient Rome. Journal of the History of Sexuality, 7(3), 330.

Thorsteinsson, R. M. (2013). Roman Christianity and Roman Stoicism: A comparative study of ancient morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Waetjen, H. C. (1996). Same-sex sexual relations in antiquity and sexuality and sexual identity in contemporary American society. In R. L. Brawley (Ed.), Biblical ethics and homosexuality (pp. xx-xx). Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox.

Witherington, B. (2004). Paul’s letter to the Romans: A socio-rhetorical commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.

Published

2024-05-29

How to Cite

Harold Pardede. (2024). Hawa Nafsu Tidak Wajar Laki Laki dan Perempuan: Perbandingan Antara Surat Seneca 95 dan Surat Paulus di Roma 1:26-27. Journal New Light, 2(2), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.62200/newlight.v2i2.117